CE 480

Case Synopsis

Corporation Management

Engineer A worked for Corporation B, a long time producer in the oil industry. There was a maintenance problem that needed to be addressed within pipeline management involving corrosion difficulties. Engineer A was in charge of the engineering group that made the decision to vary from the industry standard of practice for maintenance of this type. This group chose an alternative means of maintenance based on engineering judgment and what was thought to be the most efficient course of action in terms of finance and safety.

A problem began to grow slowly and slipped under the radar of the inspection program. 14 years later, a system failed and it was discovered that this alternative means of maintenance was inadequate. The ramifications were impacts on the economy of the market in which the company competed and national media coverage.

Engineer A’s job is now in question with possible criminal charges pending by the state. The history of Engineer A’s work with the company contains no report of dissenting opinion within his group nor does Engineer A have a record of poor engineering judgment with Corporation B.

Questions:

1) Can Engineer A’s actions be considered unethical, or is it just a case of poor engineering judgment? Is there a difference?

2) Do you feel the case warrants the dismissal of Engineer A? Are criminal charges appropriate?

3) What should be the consequence for Corporation B?

Note: It is encouraged to make assumptions on this case to answer the questions above.